来源：MCLC Resource Center
https://u.osu.edu/mclc/2026/02/07/journal-of-asian-studies-and-ai-2/ 本文由谷歌翻译自动完成。
《亚洲研究杂志》与人工智能（2）
The Journal of Asian Studies and AI（2）
作者：Magnus Fiskesjö
康奈尔大学人类学副教授
我认为阿尔特（Joseph S. Alter）已经给出了他目前的解决方案：他说，像他自己创办的《亚洲研究杂志》（这类注重声誉的优秀期刊）现在要求投稿作者必须签署一份声明，披露任何人工智能的使用情况，并且禁止使用人工智能生成文本或与机器“共同写作”。期刊会尽最大努力检测违规行为……
我同意他的说法不够清晰，我希望阿尔特能加入我们的讨论。此外，正如他自己所说，如果有人使用人工智能“写作”（机器生成）文章，然后将其冒充为自己的作品（即抄袭），并对编辑撒谎，就像以前学生对教授做的那样，那么这种禁令可能很难执行。也许期刊应该追查一些学者，并以他们为例进行惩罚（例如终身禁发论文），以起到震慑作用。
如果成功，这些期刊将成为一片充斥着抄袭“研究”的海洋中的孤岛。如今，互联网上已经充斥着机器生成的同质化、带有偏见的人工智能垃圾信息，人们也越来越习惯于将自己的思考能力外包给人工智能，而这一切都得益于许多大学也在推波助澜的行业营销炒作。
一位瑞典作家最近指出了一个更大的问题：我们现在生活在一个两极分化的信息新世界：99%的人沉浸在人工智能的垃圾信息中，而剩下的1%是那些需要真实信息的机构和超级富豪，他们愿意为此支付高昂的费用，例如军队、企业和其他无法接受虚假、带有偏见的人工智能信息，而是宁愿聘请专业的信息猎人来调查海平面是否真的在上升以及上升了多少。
现在，如果《亚洲研究杂志》宣布它正在努力坚守底线，我希望其他期刊也能加入进来。
原文：
I think Alter did give his solution, for now: he said that journals like his own Journal of Asian Studies (decent journals that care about their reputation) are demanding authors who submit articles must now sign a disclosure of any AI use, and such use is banned for anything like generating text or “co-writing” with the machines. Violations will be detected as best they can…
I agree this was not very clearly stated, and I wish Alter could join us here. Also, yes, as he himself suggests, it may be hard to enforce if people who use AI to “write” (machine-generate) submit the stuff as their own (= plagiarism), and then lie about it to the editor, like students used to do to their professors. Maybe journals should hunt some academics down, and make examples out of them (banned for life?) as a deterrent.
If successful, the journals would become like islands in a sea of plagiarized “research.” The general internet is already flooded with machine-generated homogenized AI-biased crap, and people are getting used to outsourcing their brain to AI, under all the industry marketing hype now also promoted by many universities.
The bigger issue was recently captured by a writer in Sweden who pointed out that we now have a two-tiered information new world: There’s the 99% of us now swimming in AI slop, and then there is the new 1% of institutions and the ultrawealthy who need real information and are paying top dollar for it, like militaries, corporations and others who can’t just go along with fake biased AI slop and prefer to pay professional information hunters instead, to find out if the sea levels are really rising and how much.
Now, if the Journal of Asian Studies declares it is trying to hold the line, I’d hope others would join it.
本篇文章来源于微信公众号: 在美国学历史